What to read next

Leave a comment

Sort by
  • newest
  • oldest
  • most voted
avatar

46 Comments on "“Arjun In Present Form Can Never Be Our MBT, 2 More Regiments Possible”"

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

Thanks for the update Shiv!! I am looking forward to the full trial results, and hopefully, you and/or Ajai should post it soon.

I have a question on this statement: "Army have in-principle agreed to the suggestion that the Arjun in its present form can occupy four tank regiments. But there is resistance to this idea from the field."

Is there resistance to adding more regiments or is there resistance to the fact that they are stopping at just four regiments? What do the soldiers in the field who use Arjun say?

Cane-an
Guest
6 years 2 months ago

Way to go Shiv! Great article!

dexy
Guest
6 years 2 months ago

Although the Army could bi part of the problem, my opinion is that it is DRDO's fault for not exploring the needs of market its aiming.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago
What a donkey to state that the tank has been given its due, if only 4 regiments are ordered. The Indian Armys serving generals seem to have their ego decide everything. ""The Army is quite clear. We need to close one chapter and begin another. Call it Mark-2, call it something else. But things need to move forward. It is unhealthy how things have progressed, though I can say in the last three years there appears to be a much greater empathy between the Army and DRDO about how to take things forward. Let's hope it continues." In other words,… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

If the tank does not suit the army's philosophy, why not publish the results of the trails? Why the secrecy?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

this is pure BS. Army does not want Indian equipment. Why dont they join Russian Army and fight for them using russian metal

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

Shiv, I'm not sure if your source is not a shill, even if he is a senior officer. This is the second time you've talked about only 2 more regiments. Is there a possibility the story is a plant and your officer one of the famous Natasha dance bar patrons? 🙂

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

Good article & thanks for it Arrorji. Army & DRDO should work together as a team rather than blaming each other to get something that is our own.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

Don't take the blame, take the Tank.

Cancel the FMBT and get the army to put as much electronics they want into the Mark 2 Arjuns. We cannot be in R&D stage forever. It's time to build, build and build our own and indegenize more and more percentage. And Mark 2 Arjun is closer to that goal than any FMBT not even on the drawing boards yet.

RAMAKRISHNA
Guest
6 years 2 months ago

Thanks for the Info Shiv,

Lets hope that Army orders at-least 10-12 regiments of ARJUN for rajasthan and other places where it can be pitted against the enemy. Simultaneously DRDO can keep its production line busy and incorporate state-of-art new technologies, structural changes so that it can prove its mettle as Futuristic MBT.

Hey I have a doubt. Can Carbon composites be used in Arjun to reduce weight and increase survivability and life?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

Pardon my ignorance but how many units form a regiment?

joydeep ghosh
Guest
6 years 2 months ago
Hi shiv I need your assessment on the following. will be pleased if you consider it worthwhile to shed some light on it. T90s 1. Shut T-90s production line after 1200 2. Use the money that was to be used for the remaining 457 to acquire Shtora active protection system and the T-90’s thermal imaging (TI) sights. 3. Indigenously develop a variant of the INVAR missles. Arjun 1. Expand production line to 1200. 2. Find ways to reduce Arjun Mk-2 weight below 50. 3. Enhance its night fighting ability with indigenous TI systems. 4. Makeup the disadvantage to weight, width… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

You are f**king genius joydeeeep!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

dexy, you are talking like a complete moron, the arjun is made to the army's order EXACTLY as it asked and you are saying "not exploring the market".

bl00dy soap seller, this is not a detergent powder, this is a tank that is made EXACTLY as the sutomer wants it to be.

PanIndian MarathaM
Guest
PanIndian MarathaM
6 years 2 months ago
Congrats DRDO! Since in its present form 2 more tank regiments are possible and only the sensible thing to do to present a formidable armoured challenge in thar desert. What about the plains of punjab? May be no. A new tank has to be built which should be able to cross the many rivers present in punjab. The resistence from 'field' = Foreign lobbyists,. These people are obviously being paid. These guys should be singled out and subjected to corruption check. Everybody knows that Arjun cannot be the mainstay of the armoured corps but if arjun cant then T-90 definitely… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

What is interesting is the comment that Arjun is of a "different design philosophy" which will not fit in Army's plans.

What is strange about this comment is that it was the Army who formed the requirement for such a "design philosophy"!

Why does the Army makes us want to believe that DRDO built the tank through day dreaming and presented it to the army on one fine morning!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

How does one get a job as a Tank driver like Shiv?

Pramod
Guest
Pramod
6 years 2 months ago
@ anon 12:30PM The requirement was projected in early 80s… hopin dat the tank would be ready in a few years… Its been quarter of a century since those requirements were projected.. of course the tank has already outlived its "Philisophical Life"… The army doctrine keeps changing depending on various strategic factors.. though they are not complete turnarounds, but with every new doctrine comes a new way of using our forces to the best possible extent.. but after a quater of century, it surely will look different.. If the Army's philosophical requirement is asked for to make a machine, atleast… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

If Army is sincere when it talks about its design philosophy, then the next step would be to chalk out the requirement for the FMBT. Its time we stop creating our needs and requirements based on American, European and Russian product. Its time that we stop being the follower and be the leader.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago
I still dont get it. The Arjun is significantly superior in almost all aspects, yet the T-90 gets the okay and the Arjun is called obsolete etc. "In its present form". What the heck is that supposed to mean? Whats wrong with its present form? In its "present form" it beats the sh*t out of your T-90s. On the other hand "in its present form" the t-90 doesnt have anything. Not an engine that runs at rated power, no thermal imager, no Shotra, nothing. I even read that it cant shoot on the move and to reload for a second… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

No wonder if Arjun doesn't meet Army's reqs but how in the world Tin-90 meets Army's reqs?!!! Thats a serious doubt!!!!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

ah, pramod, fibbing again are you ?

The requirement was projected in early 80s…

1994, not early 80's, check again.

wtf is hopin dat ?
anyway, the tank was ready by 1997 and additional improvements like the digital FCS were completed by 2000

If the Army's philosophical requirement is asked for to make a machine, atleast the DRDO must make an endeavour to show its first workable prototype before the Philisophy's time Expires.. and not 30 yrs after the IDEA struck us … 😉

STOP lying !

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

this is pure crap from the army…

they just don't want the arjun….and have no logical reason whatsoever..so are talking in this misleading garbage.

its a very sad episode for our domestic defence industry..

the govt. should intervene here..it really shud…

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago
Dedicated to all the Fraud stars who preferred derailing of indegenious product and effort for senseless reasons and daring to continue so even now: 'You, oh men of religion are a leaning walla tottering fence not hearing because of unbelievingand not seeing because you’re damnedby your mouths full of pleasant words and iron hands loading cold throats to the brim with words and actions, forced pastthe caverns of your mouths to return, ragged outward proving that you are a product of construction of tangled, straggling afterthoughts of a God that should bear our full attention full devotion and not just… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago
The only "philosophical change" that has happened is Pakistan did not buy Abrahams! How can a doctrine change from wanting a T-72, then a 60 ton Arjun, then again a T-90. What is the doctrine here? What will happen if Pakistan is gifted a M1A2 as part of "WOT". Will the doctrine change again? What will we then do with the 1500 odd T-90s? If we have keep changing our doctrine every decade despite the fact that Pakistan is still struck with "t-series" and it's kids, it means we are bad at planning. The threat never changed, simple fact we… Read more »
Pramod
Guest
Pramod
6 years 2 months ago
@anon 6.35 pm… i am no preacher of arjun or t-90.. finally the end user is interested in smthin which works well..smthin which will help me screw the enemy hard and keep me alive inside for as much time as is possible to keep screwin them.. and for your info.. arjun was first sanctioned in 1974.. 1980 was the prjected date of prototype production…the first prototypes were tested in 1988… ( u said 1994 was the first date?? ) and finally don't use words like liar etc..maintain the decorum of this blog.. 🙂 .. yeah i did lie.. i said… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

The army probably thinks that Arjun is an overkill w.r.t. Pak and not worth taking the pains ie new logistics, training etc. They may be right in believing that T90 is good enough for our requirement. This belief can change rapidly if Pak gets to lay its hands on M1A1 / M1A2 Abrams. Lets hope Pak does us a favour.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

Wow! The Army sets the GSQR for the Arjun and when the DRDO delivers the product to the specification of the GSQR, the Army says it doesn't fit their doctrine! Amazing! So who were the buggers who set the GSQR? Martians?

Rahul
Guest
Rahul
6 years 2 months ago

Hi! Apologies for deviating but has the Phalcon landed at Jamnagar today?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 2 months ago

Why dont we incorporate modular armour like they have in merkava or the Japanese new tank, which would take out all the fuss that the anti-Arjun lobby has been making against its induction in large numbers in IA armored core??

Baazigarh
Guest
Baazigarh
6 years 2 months ago

first of all the idea of 30 years is all crap…….the tank has gone a long way after that "miraculous idea" struck. there have been tech enhancements and updates in the requirements to keep up with changing times but, how did we know that in that much time our enemy would be different…..!!!!!!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago
pramod, you are ignorant as well ! in that case should you shoot your mouth off before knowing the facts ? the army changed its requirements as many as four times during those thirty years you speak of, the last one being in 1994. even as late as mid 1980's the requirement was for a tank that didn't fire APFSDS rounds, a must requirement for a modern tank. http://frontierindia.net/history-of-arjun-tank-development the arjun of today has no similarity to the army requirements of 1972,1978 and 1982. it was only in 1985 that the army asked for an arjun that is close to… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago

Why dont you name the officer. How can you do an entire story, including the headline of the story, based on an anonymous source. Looks like a plant. You know such a thing could've never been entertained in a newspaper.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago

The trend worldwide has been from light to heavy. Sufficient armour= weight.
Since when did the tincans satisfy the change in army's doctrine over 30 years ? The T-90 is old too and a light tank like T-90 somehow continues to satisfy the present day requirements of Army when world has moved on to heavier better armoured tanks !!!!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago

The reason for rejecting Arjun – $$$$$

MarketInsider
Guest
6 years 1 month ago
Andrey
Guest
6 years 1 month ago

I keep wandering, why all the crazy commenters here keep yelling that Arjun is better then T-90? Is there more to this then some newspaper claims it is actually better?

Do you even allow the thought that Arjun is indeed flawed design?

Have you ever read about its flaws? 🙂

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago

andrey, what are these so-called 'flaws', why don't you educate us instead of jumping up and down shouting "flaws, flaaaws" like a orangotang ?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago
Shiv, I know you moderate this blog, but is there any reason why you don't answer any questions? I had asked the question below which was the first comment in the blog. But you haven't clarified it yet. It would be good if you can clarify it too. My question: I have a question on this statement: "Army have in-principle agreed to the suggestion that the Arjun in its present form can occupy four tank regiments. But there is resistance to this idea from the field." Is there resistance to adding more regiments or is there resistance to the fact… Read more »
Kartik
Guest
Kartik
6 years 1 month ago
The fact is that the Arjun is eminently capable of being deployed in Punjab or any other areas with canals criss-crossing teh landscape. The reason is that while being 58 tons, the Arjun's ground pressure is LOWER than that of the T-90. It is the T-90 which has a higher chance of getting bogged down in such terrain as compared to the Arjun. I just cannot understand why the IA is treating the Arjun so badly when in almost every matter the Arjun stands out as being superior to the T-90 and costs only about Rs 3-4 crore more than… Read more »
RAMAKRISHNA
Guest
6 years 1 month ago

To Mr.Andrey,

Please explain those flaws. We are very much open to understand them.

We have read so many articles/blogs on Arjun and all of them have the same complaints against ARJUN, which were rectified in course of time. And now its program has become so mature that it can incorporate future technologies within no time.

If Mark-1 is so good, understand how Mark-2 will be?

Please dont comment unless u have sound knowledge and solid proof.

Thank you.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago

I think it is time DRDO is allowed to bribe Army officers. This is what firangi companies do, and lack of 'fees' it what is hampering Arjun.

Sad to admit but out senior Army officers are not any better than Pakistani ones. Same "culture". Our Army officers turn a blind eye to corruption and incompetence of politicians, so they think they deserve a 'payout' of some sort. This they collect through bribes from defense firms and contractors.

Baazigarh
Guest
Baazigarh
6 years 1 month ago
i am a through pro ARJUN guy u will be surprised that ONE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE A GENIUS to know that the T-90 which is supplied to us is an overhauled product without the maintainance support it is costing us afew lakh less than the mighty ARJUN but along with the tech back up etc it will be atleast 6- lakh more costly than ARJUN. Therefore this is again the same ol russian con to palm off its old products for a good price and for the same price make new ones for themselves. take Admiral Gorshkov for… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago
I think the IA strategy of using T90s on the grounds that existing bridges can support them is deeply flawed. If it comes to war, the Pakis will simply destroy bridges to nullify the T90s. If the IA is going to effectively use tanks at all in Punjab, they will need to bring their own river fording equipment, and if they do, then they might as well deploy fording equipment that can carry the marginally heavier Arjun. The Arjun fitted with deep fording snorkel equipment like the Leopard 2, would also be free to roam across the canals and small… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago

DRDO is doing some work. But it is mostly outdated and not catching up with the latest which West or Russia offers.

Indian Public sectors like BEL and HAL etc are reduced their role to pure brokers. For 8-10% of orders, they will give their letter head to anyone today!!!!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
6 years 1 month ago

Are you referring to technology or kick backs? In the case of the DRDO's work on the Arjun, technology and capability wise, it is demonstrably ahead of the T90, and with substantial orders which would lead to add-ons like ERA and laser targeting jammers, could easily match the Leopard II.

I fear it is the kickback front (the offering not taking) that Indian companies fall far behind Western and Russian standards.

wpDiscuz

Copyright © . All rights reserved.