What to read next

Leave a comment

Sort by
  • newest
  • oldest
  • most voted
avatar

7 Comments on "Hope To Sign M-MRCA Deal By Year End: IAF Chief"

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
3 years 9 months ago

I don't understand our Government. First they took 6-7 years to select a bidder. Now they are taking 2 years to finalise a deal. What negotiations are going on which is taking 2 years.If these MOD offices are there in negotiation then all we know that what they are negotiating. Only bribe money, their commission, Government commission. Nothing else. Why they are playing with Inidan Security. This is the reason India cannot give reply to China and pakistan aggression. these are sons of bitches.

nikdash
Guest
nikdash
3 years 9 months ago

Please scrap this craziness. We have Su 30 MKI and Tejas. That is enough to defend the country and not go bankrupt with so many platforms. Even USAF has only two platforms F-16 and F-15.

Recent Chinese stealth plane developments have made these 4 plus generation planes obsolete. Humble opinion.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
3 years 9 months ago

Even they they not clear that the manufacture or assemble the aircraft like copy or paste and even if take a year batter buy more su30mki and chase for 5th generation because I an sure before 2020 china start Induction of 5th gene. & pakistan too so why we approach for 4th gene . Even it take a year after deal to mannage the assembly line or the want to rech the Extent with France where at the name of bid gainig maximum bribe

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
3 years 9 months ago

Middle Eastern country of Iran has tested Qaher-313 ( F-313) a stealth fighter jet fully built indeginously while India daydreams on things that they cannot implement without any delays. It seems India lacks positive thinkings and positive actions from bottom up to the top levels.

Kana
Guest
Kana
3 years 9 months ago
and Russia has many more platforms than just 2 fighters, yet is not bankrupt. same with China. India prepares to fight very different types of wars than the USAF, why should USAF be it's model? all Su-30 and Tejas (with AMCA in future, and legacy platforms in-between continuing their service life) could work… but Rafale is rather efficient at it's job, Su-30 is not meaningfully better at A2G strike except for niche roles like Brahmos carrier. And the point comes down to ToT, producing more Su-30 doesn't net any more ToT. Rafale appears to offers some meaningful ToT that will… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
3 years 9 months ago

The Rafale should be the last fighter that we buy from abroad. Period

nikdash
Guest
nikdash
3 years 9 months ago
Please shed more light considering our inventory 5 years out: MKI, TEJAS, M2000, Jaguar, Rafale10 years out: MKI, TEJAS, M2000, Jaguar, Rafale, PAKFA15 years out: MKI, Tejas, M2000, Jaguar, Rafale, PAKFA and AMCA. TOT is never ever going to work … No one is willing to share their core technologies to give birth to substitutes or competition. That is called stupidity which the french are definitely not. We have built enough technological base via Tejas to build twin engine fighters. Anything else will throwing away money, which I may point is scarce with budget cuts. We canot emulate China with… Read more »
wpDiscuz

Copyright © . All rights reserved.