What to read next

8 Comments

  1. 1

    Abhiman

    Mr. Aroor, the last paragraph of your article is excellent in my view. It is high time that the media starts to question defence-deals. It may not be in defence, but after all it is Indian taxpayer’s fund and he must be answered to.
    Such articles help to highlight very important issues unlike usual political occurences, films and other “small-talk”.

    However, the “danger” of such foreign presentations is that the services almost always end up purchasing it. Like the Tejas and Arjun now, the MCA might also be kept in abeyance indefinitely, while the IAF might sign contract after contract for foreign fighters like F-35 etc.

    Thank you.

    Reply
  2. 2

    sniperz11

    I dont think a presentation by L-M should be looked at as a serious indicator of interest on the part of the MoD. After all, a lot of suppliers do the same. We must trust the IAF to be smart enough.

    Reply
  3. 3

    Prashanth

    Hey Shiv, when’s the post on the Tajikistan base coming up?

    Reply
  4. 4

    Anonymous

    Shiv, what happened to the part 1 of the 5 part article on “State of the PAF”. I think I saw the first part here on livefist but then it was taken off.
    Thank You

    Reply
  5. 5

    Anonymous

    Is it possible to join in block development program as partner in JSF at this stage?

    Eitherway, India cant be a developmental partner if it choose any other a/c except Mig-35.

    Joe

    Reply
  6. 6

    Abhiman

    Mr. Aroor, from a strategic point of view India is considering between 2 projects viz. the MCA by DRDO and the purchase of Russian ‘PAK-FA’.

    I fully agree with your view that F-35 is a “mis-fit”. If chosen in ANY manner, the media must decisively begin to question the government.

    We may recall that the US has also made presentations of their Patriot and Aegis missile systems also. It was a “stroke of good luck”, that DRDO has already thwarted the attempts of politicians and corrupt army officials to purchase the Patriot by conducting the timely tests of the PAD (Prithvi Air Defence).
    Now, derived of a political reason, the expensive foreign missiles cannot be purchased.

    In the same way, the DRDO must expedite work on the MCA soon, so that this F-35 proposal also has no basis to be considered. Infact, even the proposal for outright purchase of Russia’s ‘PAK-FA’ is already being resisted successfully by the DRDO’s indigenous MCA proposal.

    Thank you.

    Reply
  7. 7

    Abhiman

    Mr. Aroor, today’s edition of ToI had 2-3 reports that endorsed the MRCA contract (with the “ritual parading” of the 6 contenders).

    The newspaper is infact endorsing the 5th Gen. contract with some foreign country viz. either US or Russia. Hence, you may highlight all available information about the DRDO’s MCA before the politicians in tandem with newspapers like ToI completely delete it from not only public memory, but also any past existence. Its announcement may also be infamously be described by ToI’s Rajat Pandit as “..yanked out of its hat..”

    Mr. Aroor, I may request you to raise the issue about the ‘PAK-FA’ purchase, the recent F-35 presentation in the light of DRDO’s indigenous MCA proposal WHICH LITERALLY HAS BEEN FORGOTTEN IN THE MOD AND IAF. The manner in which they function is no different than a school-teacher checking hundreds of answer sheets, having forgotten what the child wrote only 2 answer-sheets back. They will however keep a discrete and cold-merchant like note of their students who take private tuitions.

    The MCA has similarly been forgotten by the IAF & the MoD, but these presentations of F-35 and PAK-FA’s announcement by Russian defence minister on 26th Jan can be remembered if the wick is oiled by the prospect of vested interests.

    Thank you.

    Reference :-

    1) DRDO working on MCA project (The Hindu)
    http://www.hindu.com/2007/02/10/stories/2007021017110500.htm

    2) Aeronautics – A DRDO perspective (Speech of Dr. Natarajan in Feb 2007) :-
    http://www.domain-b.com/aero/report_details.aspx?id=222

    Reply
  8. 8

    Abhiman

    As concrete proof of the fact that India barely is to have any technological contribution to the Russian fifth generation Sukhoi fighter, is the following report by Russia’s RIA Novosti :-

    http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070808/70574505.html

    There is NO mention of India at all in this report. It categorically mentions that the design of the fighter has been handed to the “famed” Sukhoi design bureau. The prototype is expected to start construction very shortly—without any Indian participation thus far.

    Thus, it may be ‘crystal clear’ now, that except providing finance, India has no contribution whatsoever in Russia’s fifth generation fighter programme. It is only Indian media which reports it as a “Joint venture” between Russia and India.

    Even government sources (if I am not wrong) have incorrectly commented that India will have technological inputs in the Russian fighter. It may only be a ploy to route Indian investment in the programme for vested interests. Otherwise, it is very surprising that there has not been even a cursory mention of the MCA project by DRDO by the IAF or the government.

    Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © . All rights reserved.