What to read next

24 Comments

  1. 1

    Anonymous

    Great pics ……..
    Shiv What's its displacement and is it comparable to admiral Gorshkov ?

    Reply
  2. 2

    Anonymous

    Nice… Nice to see that the russians are putting 'our' money to good use!!

    Reply
  3. 3

    Anonymous

    Where are u Prasun??
    I have been waiting for ur retarded comments.So missing u man….:(

    Reply
  4. 4

    Anonymous

    seems to be a mig-AT onboard? appears to be different from gorshakov!

    Reply
  5. 5

    Anonymous

    there is freget M2EM radar on the top of the mast

    and probably same radar going to be used in grokshkov or probably
    freget MAE too

    Reply
  6. 6

    Anonymous

    su33 is much bigger than mig29k

    Reply
  7. 7

    Tejaswy

    Man is this ship accident prone or what….?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_aircraft_carrier_Admiral_Kuznetsov

    Anything special for posting its pics shiv?

    Reply
  8. 8

    Payeng

    So whats the big deal with the Kuznetsov here? Are this amongst the latest pics or any interview upcomming?

    Reply
  9. 9

    Anonymous

    Nice… Nice to see that the russians are putting 'our' money to good use!
    ——————————–
    what money u r talking about,india has to pay $ 947 million for gorky and by now india has paid only $ 700 million out of $ 947 million

    and india still has to pay $ 247 million,so what 'our" money .
    ——————————–

    to anon 7.31

    thats not mig at thats su25 naval version

    Reply
  10. 10

    Tejaswy

    Su 33 navy version …not su 25

    Reply
  11. 11

    Anonymous


    Can any1 give me detailed comparison b/n su-33 and mig-29k.How does mig-29k fair against su-33 in bvr??Can we fit brahmos on a mig-29K.
    Even a decent link would do.

    Reply
  12. 12

    Anonymous

    What a sad looking "aircraft carrier"!

    The Russians haven't even mastered catapault launching, their career is a toy just for show, just like ours unfortunately.

    We should invest in engineering an indigenous electrically powered lauch system for aircrafts ASAP.

    Reply
  13. 13

    Anonymous

    Su 33 navy version …not su 25

    =====================
    no there is naval version of su25 as well ,and su33 is naval version flanker

    the smaller aircraft is naval su25

    Reply
  14. 14

    Supersallu

    The ninth photo has Mig-AT.

    And the carrier has Su-33s which are heavy weight naval fighters while our Mig-29Ks are medium weight naval fighters, so can't compare Mig-29Ks with Su-33.

    Reply
  15. 15

    Anonymous

    I doubt Brahmos on Mig 29 for our Navy. It will increase its weight substantially which will make it difficult for short takeoff.

    I was wondering why can't Russia and India go CATOBAR type of aircraft carrier rather than this STOBAR.

    Reply
  16. 16

    Anonymous

    y does it take to post a comment here

    Reply
  17. 17

    Anonymous

    to shiv

    i have posted 2 comments earlier where are they why the hell it takes so long to post

    Reply
  18. 18

    Anonymous

    coz,Shiv is a jacka$$

    Reply
  19. 19

    Tejaswy

    Well i think shiv likes to moderate the comments for spam.
    he could put up a spam catching s/w and spare us the wait.

    Reply
  20. 20

    Anonymous

    to Supersallu said…

    The ninth photo has Mig-AT
    ———————————
    thats not mig at thats a su25 naval version

    look at nose an rudder of ninth photo and then see some pics of
    mig at and compare nose and rudder with mig at pics u will come to know what is truth
    ——————————–
    those who saying why russia didn't master catapult techniq

    its not about mastery its about cost

    STOBAR is simplest/cheapest option compared to STOVL,CATOBAR

    in STOVL option there is need for much complex aicraft which is costly to maintain and to develop becoz of sedign complexity

    and in CATOBAR there is need for catapult which depend on size of ship and is costly too

    Reply
  21. 21

    Mongo

    The MiG-29Ks India is receiving are more advanced than the Su-33s Russia has in service.

    Reply
  22. 22

    Anonymous

    no su33 isn't inferior to mig29k

    mig29k has zhuk me radar and bigger version of this radar is now being exported to vietnam for their su30 and same can be fitted to su33 along with glass cockpit

    all matters is money

    Reply
  23. 23

    NJS

    Mig -29k is equal to su-33 , but the difference is su-33 in heavier & bigger than mig-29k, china eagerly looking for 50 nos su-33 for its carrier .To safe guard indian Aircraft carriers we massively needed more Submarines . India need to manufacture more large nos of ATV sub's , which seems to be latest & deadlier ( most of the tech is from russia )..

    Reply
  24. 24

    NJS

    brahmos cannot be fitted with mig29k its needs heavier jet like su-33. in indian fighters only su30 mki can carry brahmos , that too if it is modified specially for it . recently india has sended 2 su30 mki for russia for modification to carry bramhos missiles . To have edge with chinese su- 33 navel fighter , Mig 29k hardly needs ( air to air missile with 175 km range , but it also needs aesa radar to operate longer range missiles )

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © . All rights reserved.