What to read next

7 Comments

  1. 1

    Anonymous

    NSR says —

    India must produce a lot of them and also station them in many Naval Bases / Stations armed with latest anti-ship and anti-submarine missiles / torpedoes …

    A ship can't travel fast but Navy Tejas I can be there in minutes…

    It will act as a great deterrent to Pakistan and China trying to intrude into Bay of Bengal and Arabian sea…

    Whenever needed, they can be available to land and conduct sorties from there…

    These fighters only costs $30 millions per plane so India must hurry and build many for Navy and Air Force…

    Air Force should not base them in Sulur, Tamilnadu…They should build at least 6 squadrons of Tejas I and place them from Rajasthan to Arunachal Pradesh…

    It is very cheap to scramble them than the 2 engine fighter bombers…

    Unless Dassault comes clean with respect to TOT and MOTs, product quality responsibility, schedule of delivery, etc, then do not buy it as it will siphon the money away from much needed SU-30MKI, Mig-29, Tejas I& II, Jaguar engine upgrade, etc

    Go on war footing to manufacture and block upgrade so that when Tejas II comes up all this process will be there and there will be no delays due to lessons learned…

    Indigenize the components as much as possible…Import if needed to develop the product instead of delaying or stopping the production…

    If given priority, it will create India's aerospace industry which is boon to India..

    Reply
  2. 2

    Anonymous

    Good show Naval LCA team!
    Did it do an arrested landing too??

    Reply
  3. 3

    Balaji

    As part of Carrier Compatibility Tests (CCT), first step was to do the ski jump launch. Arrested recovery tests will be carried out later.

    The greatest challenge was the control law design to handle the ski jump launch in a 'hands free' mode of an 'unstable' delta wing aircraft

    Reply
  4. 4

    Anonymous

    I feel it is adamant on part of LCA desiegn team and ignore to modify the air intakes as that is and would hamper the thrust of LCA.if they don't change then LCA would be like a asthmatic long distance runner who would not finish his race.

    They should put front canards as that would improve the performance of LCA considerably.

    They have to develop a fully computerized assembly line where the plane can be quickly built and as the structure is completed be transferred to adjoining shades by tractors where the avionics and final build up must take place.

    There has to be a project coordinator who is an instrumentation guy with management skills.

    There has to be a technology park and every component be built then and there so that there is uninterrupted supply line to feed for continuous non stop production.

    The prototype for LCA MK2 be built on a computerized assembly line and quickly built atleast 4 to 6 prototypes and quickly test ti and start a full scale production.

    Buying this expensive Rafale would end the future of IAF as they would not be able to come out and have enough numbers on Tarmak.

    Try to built every component of SU30 MKI so that its servicibility be improved and atleast 80-85 percent of fleet is ready and thus another 100 planes bbe added to active status.

    Start designing twin engined MCA which is larger LCA with two engines and let it be like YF 23 with delta wings which would be cheaper and easy to develop as
    With the experience with LCA.

    Try to develop passive stealth with nano particle films in the composites and radar absorbing paints to add passive stealth and use active jammers to increase its lethality.
    If this changes are not implimented then pretty much LCA would end up like MARUT and the future of IAF is sealed to a very limited Air Force.
    I know shiv would not publish this comment for which I don't care but the message is loud and clear few arrogant guys ruined this great project and killed this prospective great plane.
    I loved planes and that's what I did all my life and that's why I feel hurt for the demise of great effort.
    The team has to learn from Grippen E which is fill it , load it , shut it and fly again and again with least possible wait.

    Thanks if you publish it.

    My last post

    TIMBAKTOO

    Reply
  5. 5

    Balaji

    Air intake in the second Naval prototype has been modified. It has a number of auxiliary air intake doors that gives a thrust boost for carrier takeoff. Air intake of LCANavyMk2 is completely being redone.

    Reply
  6. 6

    Anonymous

    Impressive. I am always a fan of the Tejas. The 2 seat version looks more "right" than the single seat. The US F/A18E/F 2 seat also has better transonic aerodynamics than the single seat due to better area ruling. I wonder if it is the same for Tejas.
    I always believe that India should put all its money into indigeneous programs, Tejas being one, and drop the Rafale. Although a capable aircraft, it is too late, sitting on the fence of technology change.
    A future full composite Tejas with thrust vectoring to eliminate the tail will be very stealthy. One could enlarge, lengthen a future Tejas to use the 45000lb F35 engine and incorporate integral weapon bays. These have been proven decades ago with the F16XL.
    Armed with AAM like Meteor, I doubt a Rafale would be better.

    Reply
  7. 7

    Anonymous

    Indian navy is very pragmatic and have taken the responsibility of developing the Naval LCA and even sponsored the development from its own funds. If the air intakes are modified my hats off to you commander Balaji.You would succeed and if the project succeeds try developing Delta winged YF23 which would be easy to develop with internal weapons bay and would be the main strike platform for navy. My best wishes for the same. YF 23 in my opinion is perhaps the best plane ever designed and we were upset when it was not selected.

    Thanks ,

    TIMBAKTOO

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © . All rights reserved.