What to read next

39 Comments

  1. 1

    Pritam

    Thanks alot! What a design. It looks to me as a revised version of the F-22 Raptor with lot of changes. I want to see the real MCA in IAF color.

    It will not take much time like LCA, because of experience, infrastructure and money are available.

    Reply
  2. 2

    3rd ~ EyE

    I suppose the first unofficial description abt MCA was that they had no tail-plain (2 reduce RCS) , but relied on 3D Thrust vectoring …

    Is the model presented here Wind tunnel tested … & finalized ?

    Reply
  3. 3

    Ayan

    Great to see the wind tunnel model of MCA. It means work has already started!!! Features are obviously great and of great standards… Now only thing to do is to complete the project in time……Best wishes to the MCA team…..

    Reply
  4. 4

    Anonymous

    Getting a bit ahead of ourselves arent we? DRDO hasnt even managed to produce an LCA, 30 years after the program began. Im guessing the MCA will take….. ohhh, till 2040?

    Reply
  5. 5

    Anonymous

    Nice model.

    Will it ever materialize?

    Reply
  6. 6

    Tejaswy

    Looks like a f22 raptor…What say?

    Reply
  7. 7

    Anonymous

    Looks quite similar to the F22 Raptor …

    Reply
  8. 8

    aegsr

    any details u managed to collect about this MCA mr. aroor?????

    Reply
  9. 9

    Abhijoy

    So… clearly the MCA and PAK-FA projects have merged. Why does DRDO keep designating them as separate entities. The concepts are nearly identical.

    P.S. The crude sheet metal mock up and slide look like theyve been made by someone in junior school.

    Reply
  10. 10

    Anonymous

    Beauty. I hope they receive required funding from GOI.

    Reply
  11. 11

    Anonymous

    The air intakes are critical for reducing the radar signature and making this a stealth aircraft. Pic 1 may be an indicator of how much stealth this puppy can have. I suppose it may be no better than any existing 4.5 gen aircraft. OTOH, large intakes must be good for thrust generation.

    Reply
  12. 12

    Bobs

    that’s nothing to worry ,shiv…the mca will look totally different from that..i have pics of the lca wind tunnel model with me…if u see those you won’t believe that (if u compare with the present prototypes)..the wind tunnel model almost looked like the gripen with box intakes and canard foreplanes.

    Reply
  13. 13

    Anonymous

    that Note in the 3rd image clearly says it is conceptual design…so these model has nothing to do with MCA…grow up..man…and don’t post everything crap you find…

    Reply
  14. 14

    Anonymous

    It is just an conceptual design..It is not MCA.

    Reply
  15. 15

    Anonymous

    That NOTE in the 3rd image..clearly says..it is just conceptual…

    Reply
  16. 16

    Anonymous

    what is the meaning of two engined gen 5 aircraft,PAK FA also is 2 engined and better develop a single engined gen 5 aircraft thats more economic

    Reply
  17. 17

    Tejaswy

    I don’t think Pak FA and MCA will be merged.

    Me thinks that the technical knowledge gained by the the participation of HAL on PAK FA project will be used MCA to be a better.

    It is always comforting to know we can build good quality “Desi aircrafts” at will in event of a war

    At the conceptual design stage i think a point needs to mentioned here.

    If the MCA needs to have TVC it will have to increase the space between the engines exhausts

    Reply
  18. 18

    Zorin

    It might not be a boost to the ego, but if we compare where India was only a decade ago I think India needs to plan ahead but take baby steps first to get there.No point trying to equal the Americans right now.A perfect plan is collaboration and even copying like the Made in China stuff which will give India the know how, access to sharp technology and then India can stand alone and produce technology.Unfortunately the DRDO is thinking ahead of itself especialy the fact there are still technology availability barriers and as a result neither are they reaching their objectives nor are they plugging the obvious gaps in Indian defence.The other problem is the whole defence area is now ruled by South Indians who are great thinkers and smart technicians but too lay back and generally pacifists in nature.India needs to merge the “brains” with the Shivaji spirit.

    Reply
  19. 19

    neosumit

    correctly said its a pak-fa

    Reply
  20. 20

    Divine

    Bobs,
    There were at least two designs of the LCA that were in consideration. One was the one that you mention – with canards. Eventually, the present design was chosen.
    This displayed model is not necessarily the final design. Earlier DRDO wanted a tail-less configuration, now this F-22 like design.

    Reply
  21. 21

    Divine

    Bobs,
    There were at least two designs of the LCA that were in consideration. One was the one that you mention – with canards. Eventually, the present design was chosen.
    This displayed model is not necessarily the final design. Earlier DRDO wanted a tail-less configuration, now this F-22 like design.

    Reply
  22. 22

    Anonymous

    friends look at the butt of the model it looks like a marut.

    And HAL wont be participating in PAF FA, just reproducing it like Su 30 mki and probobly sitting together with sukhoi when the one seater russian aircraft gets coverted to 2 seater aircraft for india. India’s contribution to PAK FA would be 50% at the end of 50year life cycle……mostly providing money…..
    By the way why does india need a two seater aircraft, Both MMRCA and PAK fa would be 2 seaters…..are IAF pilots afraid to fly alone or is it that the IAF found out that the reason for the MiG crashes were due to pilot black-outs so for safety reasons IAF have vowed to have 2 seater aircraft…….

    Reply
  23. 23

    Bobs

    Divine @ 9:44am
    Its not that DRDO wants this “f-22” design…its simply because the Indo-Rus FGFA (known as PAK-FA) has reached a dead end.So,its the IAF which has encouraged DRDO to go ahead with the plans..(albeit modified ,to accommodate the needs of a heavy duty FGFA along with the original mca design)

    Reply
  24. 24

    Divine

    OK,

    Where is the definite confirmed news report that the PAK-FA programme is dead?

    The copious amount of blood letting that has taken place in the media and various fora over the Gorshkov saga is well known. The truth lies somewhere in the fact that the price escalation is because India has contracted for certain measures that are secret and shocking enough.

    Soon you will hear the news of the Nerpa issue being resolved like there was never a problem, there is also a rumour now of four akulas in the deal with atleast two in functional service with the Indian Navy, the ADS, and Indo-Russian cooperative effort will also hit the seas this year.

    In the final analysis, the Indo-Russian defence cooperation remains in as firm a footing as it ever was.

    Reply
  25. 25

    Arun

    Bobs,could you send me the pics of the LCA wind tunnel model with the canards and box air inlets??
    I would really appreciate it if you could.
    Thank you

    Reply
  26. 26

    Bobs

    divine @ 8:36pm
    sorry sir, i can’t disclose my source…it amounts to treason…yeah i know we have plans for ‘n’ number of akulas….last year a russian general had disclosed this…and btw,the pak-fa can still be resolved if the powers that matter agree.

    Reply
  27. 27

    Anonymous

    Hmm… even the Raptor has huge air intakes. But the shape of the inside surface of the intake are strange, as if to minimize reflections.

    Reply
  28. 28

    iambob

    Why did they choose to base the model on the Raptor ?
    Why didn’t they choose YF-23 instead, its a better design(stealthier)…

    Reply
  29. 29

    Bobs

    arun @ 1:43 am
    lemme see,if I can scan and upload it…I had taken it with a reel camera long ago.
    btw, a snap is available here:
    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/media/AeroIndia2005/Exhibits/WindTunnelModelNAL.jpg.html

    Reply
  30. 30

    Anonymous

    bobs …..thats not a tejas model, what would it be doing at aero india 2005 exebution? Moreover as far as i remember the model that you are speaking was made of a different material……and yeah its really a shame that tejas has such small intakes…..i doubt whether it exploits the full potntial of the current engine…..

    Reply
  31. 31

    Bobs

    i think the link that i posted is of the LCA model..iirc, there were 2 models kept side by side ;the first one and the latest….the model in that pic is similar to the one in the photograph with me….the material was same:-tin…but I have one more pic ,taken in 1991..which has a model in the wind tunnel..this one looks similar to the present LCA tejas..dunno abt material..the model is white in colour.

    Reply
  32. 32

    Anonymous

    yeah i have seen the white one……

    Reply
  33. 33

    Anonymous

    I am no expert but the wing design dont seem to give the plane enough control serface at the back end. India should go for a more simple wing design like the f-22, widen the body for more storage, and move the tail forward a little more. BTW, the big flappy control on the wing makes the plane look terrible.

    Reply
  34. 34

    Anonymous

    India should definitely go for a copy of f-22 Raptor–an excellent design; invest some more time and money into kaveri engine, and focus on developing stealth technology/concepts. If they do this, in 5 years they will have a very good 5th generation fighter WITH KAVERI ENGINE. Their current approach of developing a 4.5 generation fighter from scratch will take more time, money, give them less knowledge of stealth tech/conceps and slow down indigenization of kaveri.

    Reply
  35. 35

    Anonymous

    My idiotic brothers,keep ur crap words away from this blog.I dont understand how u say the f22 wing desing is simple,when it is one of the uniquest with an orthodox air intake. The mca is a totally diffent story,there 5 different wind tunnel models of which 2 r single engined,all these r not meant for common masses and r not disclosed.& for those idiots who were talking about south indians,i dont understand what the fuck u know!,morons.i am an southindian & proud to b an indian serving for the nation.OVER N OUT.jai hind(arun kurup working for DRDO)

    Reply
  36. 36

    Anonymous

    My idiotic brothers,keep ur crap words away from this blog.I dont understand how u say the f22 wing desing is simple,when it is one of the uniquest with an orthodox air intake. The mca is a totally diffent story,there 5 different wind tunnel models of which 2 r single engined,all these r not meant for common masses and r not disclosed.& for those idiots who were talking about south indians,i dont understand what the fuck u know!,morons.i am an southindian & proud to b an indian serving for the nation.OVER N OUT.jai hind(arun kurup working for DRDO)

    Reply
  37. 37

    Arun

    Thanks Bobs, for the picture. I think we should have the design with the canards and box intakes incorporated into the mark 2 design. Then we should probably start testing with the F414, and optimize airflow to the engine so that there is a potential to extract at least 30% more thrust from the F414. And we should simultaneously set a higher goal with the kaveri engine, and start designing a higher thrust version, with the 30% more airflow, and a 20% increase in turbine inlet temperatures. Flat rating is good when we can have the required minimum thrust, but if we dont, its not an advantage. DRDO should stop worrying about thrust vectoring for now, and design the new engine(based on knowledge gained in the kaveri design) and have SNECMA and some other company compete for solutions to specific problems than have them do the whole design. Every project runs into problems, and it is imperative that the problems are fixed, but also that we learn from the problems. Engine development is a dynamic process, and there is a lot to be learned. Such an engine, if development starts right now, should be completed in 6 years( including integration into the aircraft). It is possible to do this if there is a dedicated platform built for engine development. And the new engine with the higher flow rate and higher operating temps, should have an initial target thrust of 120KN.
    Thanks,
    Arun

    Reply
  38. 38

    anthony

    There are a few inherent flaws in the
    MCA wind tunnel model:

    1. Round engine nozzles:

    If they’re round, there would be no reduction in IR signature, leaving it vulnerable to IR AAMs.

    2. Front-aspect stealth:

    The MCA is only stealthy from the front quarter, like the F-35 Lightning II. You can easily paint a radar lock on the plane at any other angle, whereas the F-22 Raptor has all-aspect stealth.

    3. Lack of thrust vectoring:

    2D thrust vectoring would be useful on the MCA, significantly enhancing its maneuverability in an airspace of HOBS IR AAMs.

    Reply
  39. Pingback: EXCLUSIVE: India’s 5th Gen AMCA Targets 2030 | Livefist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © . All rights reserved.