Revealed: The LCA Tejas That The IAF Has Chosen

[URIS id=14020]

India’s home-built Tejas light fighter will finally be formally in squadron service with its primary customer, the Indian Air Force, starting Friday. On July 1, the Indian Air Force will induct a pair of series production airframes of the Tejas Mk.1 at a planned event there’s a conspicuous lack of noise about. Sure, the number of aircraft being inducted will be a tenth it takes to call itself a real squadron. And sure, the Tejas won’t be zipping off on combat air patrol or air defence duties immediately. But the significance of July 1 has perhaps already been lost in the turbulence of both the programme, as well as the way it has by default been regarded.

In October last year, your site had advocated that the LCA Tejas needs to see service as quickly as possible. That, in a sense, is what will be beginning to happen this Friday. But as you’ve probably heard already, it isn’t the Mk.1 type of the Tejas that has the IAF all lit up, but a configuration it agreed on last year designated the Mk.1A that’ll form the true Tejas backbone in service — 80 aircraft, with the possibility of 40 more have been ordered. In the tumult of operational clearance points and timelines, not very much has been reported on the Mk.1A itself and why the IAF has its sights set on the type, and what has been reported is mostly broad.

The known updates are clear. The Mk.1A will be mid-air refuellable, sport an updated internal Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) — likely in-house kit from the DRDO’s DARE laboratory — an external Self Protection Jammer (SPJ) pod to enhance survivability and an AESA Radar, both of which the Tejas programme is scouting international suppliers for. The IAF has also stipulated that the Tejas Mk.1A needs to be able to fire different types of BVR and close combat air to air missiles. The Tejas has so far fired Vympel R-73 CCMs and a Derby BVR missile. It’ll need to prove itself using the R-77, Python-5 and DRDO Astra too. Those, Livefist learns, are on track.

The meat of the Mk.1A will be a slew of major improvements in the LCA’s squadron-level maintainability contours. It is difficult to overstate just how much importance the IAF has placed on ramped up no-nonsense maintainability, more than a milestone away from the admittedly unwieldy maintenance architecture built into the Mk.1. On maintainability alone, the Tejas Mk.1A will have the 43 improvements out of 57 planned on the bigger, more powerful Tejas Mk.2:

  1. Panel interchangeability: In the prototype stage, composite panels were built and matched to specific airframes. For the Mk.1A, tooling will be built up and panels moulded lending themselves to easy interchangeability between airframes, plus spares. The IAF won’t deal with a platform that doesn’t allow at least this level of squadron-level maintainability, so this is priority.
  2. Quick access: Several airframe panels that required daily servicing have a large number of screws that need to be removed — a time consuming affair that eats into the platform’s turnaround time. These will be replaced on the Mk.1A by quick release fasteners making it easier and faster for maintainers access, considerably bringing down time required to service aircraft. Importantly, quick release fasteners will remain with the panel and therefore minimise FOD chances.
  3. Gromets in composite panels: When fasteners are regularly used for removal and installation, there is a possibility of damage and widening of holes. Mk.1A panels will have to stop this.
  4. LRU positions: A number of LRUs will be repositioned for better access. Current configurations make it nuisance to access frequently used LRUs.
  5. Additional aids: The Mk.1A package will contain ground handling aids and testers to enable speedier turnaround of aircraft

But what about the Tejas Mk.2? The planned up-engined, beefed up Tejas variant has hit a bit of a vacuum now, with the IAF all but pronouncing that it won’t be pursuing the type. A contest awarded to GE for the the F414-GE-INS6 turbofan engine hasn’t translated into a contract yet. But the Mk.2 programme is still very much on. A top official told Livefist, “As far as ADA and HAL are concerned, we are progressing design and development of Mk.2 as it has been approved by the Govt. There are benefits in continuing with it.”

Improvements planned on the Tejas Mk.2, apart from the more powerful engine and attendant expansion of op envelope, include new sensors, new indigenous actuators, and a new indigenous avionics architecture. The variant will also involve the removal of 250 kg in ballast weight, a further half ton weight reduction through revised design factors, performance improvements by “aerodynamic refinements of geometry”, an internal electronic warfare suite (incorporate in the Mk.1A plan), a brand new suite of indigenous avionics systems currently under development, a new digital flight control computer, OBOGS for mission endurance. Crucially, the Mk.2 will also sport an additional LP bleed port from the engine, a safety feature to ensure crucial backup for flight-critical Bleed Air Shut Off Valve (BASOV) failure for fuel tank pressurisation. In addition, the type will get fuel system improvements, NVG compatible external lighting with LEDs.

13 thoughts on “Revealed: The LCA Tejas That The IAF Has Chosen”

  1. And what about the aircraft cannon. Will it be a part of Mk1 specs or the coming SP series will sport it ?

    Further when can we see the FOC ?

  2. all product developments are like this. The user needs to begin to use it, then feedback provided to improve in an agile manner. So IAF & HAL can plan a tranche every 20 planes a squadron. By the third squadron most of the rough edges will be sorted out. Then the first can be upgraded or retired/cannibalised for spares.
    Great to see the positve news.

  3. Hi Editor,

    The F414-GE-INS6 engine and its induction into the LCA is required regardles whether IAF wants it or not. This is Simply because that a stronger Engine is a mandatory requirement given by the IN for the Naval LCA Project.

  4. Russians have very good jamming technology, why doesn’t DRDO develop SPJs in collaboration with the Russians

  5. Just as Pakistan is fabled to possess a paint that converts anything painted into pakistani equipment india seems to want a magic wand like in Cinderella which converted the pumpkin into a horse driven carriage

  6. The mark 2 Tejas need to be at least 1.5 metre longer , front canards, improved fuel capacity , thrust vectoring and radar evading features included. It needs a whole lot of improvements, some major ones requiring redesign work. But knowing Indian scientists it will take another 30 yrs. to introduce these improvements. That is one reason IAF is reluctant to go for the Tejas Mk.2. At this point in time giving up on Tejas will finish the Indian Aircraft industry for ever. While our adversary across the Himalayas is testing the fifth gen. air crafts. It is wise to remember wars can’t be fought on bought out equipment. If you haven’t got the industrial power, don’t start a war.

    1. Without giving enough money, nobody can make changes fast. IAF and the gov of earlier regime have given funds to scientfic community in bits in comparison to the counterparts that have developed the same kind of platform for the first time. So delay is the fault of gov and corrupt IAF officials and babus.

    1. ?, didn’t get u r point, please explain ! Always remember it is the very first Indian attempt to design and build a fighter . I do admit it has taken far too long to come this far though.

      1. Second attempt. Asia’s first supersonic fighter was designed in HAL by Prof.Kurt Tank, iconic designer of the Fockewolf fighter – HF24 Marut

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top