Finally the aspect ratio seems perfect on the Tejas ! the Mk2 seems to have taken care of all the major drawbacks noticed on the Mk1. Additional fuel for more fuel fraction means longer range and endurance and once the basics are right, additional or more modern avionics can be added at a later date.
Shiv You are doing a marvelous work for your frequent visitors from all over India. Without you we all would be Dhritrastra . you are Sanjay for us. Keep it up bro
Shiv, can you kindly present us a comparative study between Tejas Mk 2 and Gripen NG?? I don't want to hear the Air Chief dubbing Tejas as "Mig-27++"..
Tejas-Mk2 is clearly an elongated Mk1 with more power and space to equate or exceed the vaunted Gripen-NG.
Finally the aspect ratio seems perfect on the Tejas ! the Mk2 seems to have taken care of all the major drawbacks noticed on the Mk1. Additional fuel for more fuel fraction means longer range and endurance and once the basics are right, additional or more modern avionics can be added at a later date.
Shiv You are doing a marvelous work for your frequent visitors from all over India. Without you we all would be Dhritrastra . you are Sanjay for us.
Keep it up bro
Shiv you have not told us what you think of the Mk2. What is your opinion?
Shiv, can you kindly present us a comparative study between Tejas Mk 2 and Gripen NG?? I don't want to hear the Air Chief dubbing Tejas as "Mig-27++"..
shiv, plz provide detailed analysis on mk2……….
If you get us the high-res CAD diagrams of the Mk2 it will be awesome.
Indranil
Shiv!!!!
Man you rocks
Thanks for all these posts and updates..
Now I think LCA is more comparable to f-16 vista
-Abhilash
What is the AOA for mk2?
Looks more or less same as mk.1. Why is this going to take another 8 years to develop?